Twitter

Honestly, I have never heard of Twitter before reading the assignment for this week. After reading the posts that our Professor tagged, I now have an initial understanding of Twitter although I know that for our next lab, we will create a Twitter account and will explore its tools. This means that after this Wednesday, I will gain a better understanding of Twitter.

Let me share with you my first impression of what I read about Twitter and how I feel about it at this point.

First and far most important, as always, I have many questions about Twitter. I have not and will not explore for answers to my questions because I do not want my thoughts to be satisfied, at least not for the time being. Perhaps after the lab on Wednesday, I will have a change of heart as I'm sure that I will change some parts to this post to reflect a better more informative experience that I gained about or after using Twitter.

My second point to my first impression is that only after reading the first few lines of the assigned readings, Twitter appeared to be just another social utility like facebook. I honestly do not like favebook and have closed my account as a result. I feel that since I got into the social networking era, it became a hard habit to leave and very time consuming.

Third and last point for this post. I find Twitter a social networking utility with a large potential to grow. At this stage, the company is struggling a bit with its IT staff and keeping the system running without glitches. As any and even current www company, those challenges are just part of the nature of being online. Another reason why I think that Twitter will grow in popularity is because this company has different uses that can actualy be useful and make the lives of its users easier and more convenient.

If you would like to read more on my thoughts, come back and visit after Wednesday when we complete our lab on Twitter.

Brainstorming N Teams

How do you brainstorm?

Think of a storm of ideas going through your head. Now, dodge all of it down, no matter how bad the idea sounds to you. Basically, that is the way I define brainstorming.

The traditional meaning of brainstorming is that it's done in teams either individually or collectively. When done individually, then the term is "Virtual Brainstorming". This has been the terminology for many years until the introduction of the internet.

Now, virtual teams can be referred to: virtual characters of people who work in a team as pointed out by my classmate Na Rae in her post Communication matters of virtual team- working.

Originally, from my experience, I always thought that brainstorming generated better results when done directly together in teams. In fact, I think and produce better ideas when I work in teams versus alone. This is obviously the case when the brainstorming process is done right although it's not as efficient as working individually.

Today, I found out that I was wrong. After reading this post: Brainstorming? Try doing it virtually by Jessica Lipnack who quoted some research results, I came to realize what I was missing from the bigger picture. According to research studies, virtual brainstorming outperforms brainstorming groups nearly by two times.

Citizen Journalism, Good?

One day you are out and suddenly you see an accident happening in front of you. What would you do?

A good citizen would: call 911 and/or try to help.

But , What if you: simply did not have time OR had a previous bad experience?

These days, even when you try to offer your help, you get in trouble. It is important to reach out to help with good intentions and hopeful results. Still, just by being a witness, you could end up in an investigation. The most you can do in a critical situation is to call 911.

Citizens have duties towards them selves and each other.

Now, what if you were asking for trouble?

"asking for trouble" , bare with me as I elaborate further.

3 months ago, our communication professor assigned a reading for our next class. Among the readings, there was one that I thought was very interesting. That reading was on Citizen Journalism.

When I first read the title of "Citizen Journalism" , I thought to my self: doing what journalists do but without the job title. This can be dangerous.

Remember the tech massacre virginia?

Some students wanted to get quick shots and videos from their phones to help out by covering the scenes. Imagine how risky and dangerous that would be. Now, imagine if you were a journalist who does that for a job to make a living.

Not any person whose job title does not include the description of journalist is simply qualified to report on news. Even if he/she had the means (camera, cell phone, etc...) AND even if the story they are witnessing could be priceless.

Practicing citizen journalism can be risky and dangerous and more importantly, it is a trust.

CNN launched a new site on the internet that it called iReport. Basically, any any any one with access to the internet can post any any any report.

You can imagine what kinds of reports were published although eventually, taken down. What is the point of letting those kinds of reports get published in the first place? What happened to credibility?

People misuse CNN's iReport section because CNN has the credibility. So if they publish a title like: Steve Jobs had a heart attack or even something like IBM filed for bankrupcy.

Well, what is the effect of these falsified news?

Aside from it being not true, it is a lie and a shameless scare on the web sites that allowed the false posts to take place. Monetary loses in the stocks of those companies involved. Intangible loss and destruction of reputation that took years to build.

Social Networks

Social Networks. What is the first thought that you got now?

The first thought that I got is facebook.

I read the last posts of my fellow classmates who are with-in my blog circle. Those posts' main topic is on social networks and specifically about facebook.

In the blog posts, my fellow classmates are complaining about facebook.

Among the posts that I read, the most common reason I found when using facebook was the issue of privacy. My initial response to any internet site is: privacy.

Basically, the internet has no privacy. Even of you have the most secure site in hisotry, it's just a matter of time before someone breaks into your site and find what you are hiding. There are special task forces with the highest available intelligence that deal with hacking and encrypting 24/7 365 days a year.

Why my classmates complain about the privacy of facebook?
I think because it is the most site that they and the people they know use. Actually, the most used site for them is Google.com but facebook contains more sensitive information. If they were to spend as much time on any other site that contains some sensitive (personal) information beside facebook, again, they would complain about this new site.

"Spy vs Spy"

which spy are you?

I think your answer would probably be: as long as I'm the winner

Although in the video, both spys are in 2 distinct colors : black and white, I believe there exists many shades in between!

Allow me to explain my point:

You can be:

Curious
which is a sole part of the human nature

But
As they say : "the curiosity killed the cat" which is when you become very very curious

So
the next level is NOSY

The last level is : SPY
which is more like a 007 role. You do it as a part of your obsession or for a living. Can you imagine?

In this case, thanks to the spying employer, facebook is the champion of spies even though the purpose of facebook is not for spying, still its a major tool that allowed the employer to spy (a car is simply a way to get you from point A to point B but if it was used as a murder weapon, then the car is a part of the crime)

Why do I think that those two (facebook, employer) are spies?

Sadly, I am one of the people that you may know who have changed their names on facebook to make my employer's task of finding my profile a bit harder. I do not want my facebook profile to be the reason behind demotivating my future employer from hiring me. -"people weigh your words"- Unfortunetaly, from my friend's past experiences, employers often use social networking tools such as facebook as means of hiring their future candidates, but that's not always the case. I'm not being pessimistic but : when was the last time you heard that an employer hired a candidate because of the candidate's facebook profile? In fact, the opposite case is much more realistic!

I know that there are some features with-in facebook (among other social networking tools) that allows the user to set their privacy levels. Still, since facebook is public and not full proof, I'm still concerned about my employer finding my profile. As the saying suggests : "if their is a will , there is a way". If my employer wanted to find my facebook profile, they eventually will.

So, what's your take on this?


Let me know

Yooousif

http://itec335.blogspot.com/

The picture is from www.facebookspy.net

The video is from YouTube

How risky is too risky?

"NO RISK NO GAIN"

This was one of the first sentences that faced me when I started my finance course at the Kogod School of Business in the American University, Washington DC.

I do not try to be optimistic or pessimistic, instead, I go after learning how to become a realist. Take both extremes (best and worst) of any situation and strive for the best case. Keep in mind, you have to know where your current position is on that scale.

To demonstrate my point, here is a live example of an extreme optimism : Remember the mortgage crises?

How do you think it all started?

I can answer that question: it all stated with the optimistic person. This person was so optimistic that he/she gave a lot of money to a lot of people with "bad credit" as loans. Bad credit means : this person has a history of not paying a loan on time or not paying at all. In this case, the loaner (optimistic person), took a big risk by lending to people with "bad credit".

Another example is one that exists every day. A gambler. Specifically, addicts. Those people have an addiction to risk. They will not stop until they lose their shirt!

The following part is a famous dialogue between a failing student and a teacher:

Teacher: Why are you failing school?

Student: I tried but did not succeed!

Teacher: Try again.

Student: I'm afraid to fail again.

Teacher: Try harder!

Finally, the student succeeded and achieved goals !

I'm not suggesting that you take risks and gamble is Las Vegas. From my experience, taking risks wisely taught me a lot of lessons that I would have not learned otherwise.

Marketers acknowledge risk takers. In fact, consumers are divided into 5 groups based on their appetite for risk. The group with the most appetite for risk are labeled as innovators. In general, I fall in that group but it all depends on the product or service that I'm interested in.
How thirsty are you for risk?

My characteristics would be: I like taking risks. I do not wait for the reviews about a product and I would like to be among the first to own that particular product.

Again, depending on the product, I could be an innovator or not. For example, I have confidence in Apple products and I trust the brand. Therefore, I would be an innovator.

Please play the following video and let me know your opinion. I look forward to reading your comment.




Thank you for taking the risk to view my post

Yooousif

first picture: http://www.penelopeironstone.com

second picture: http://wilderdom.com

Video is from YouTube

UGC , Certified by Anyone?

2004 marked my first visit to United Stated to pursue my college degree. During my first month, I was introduced to Wikipedia.

I was not aware of the fact that anyone can post/adjust information on Wikipedia, so I took all the information on this website for granted. Later on I was notified by my Professor in Georgetown University not to use Wikipedia as a source to cite from.

The reason was because Wikipedia (in my Professor's opinion), is NOT an entirely credible source. In fact, I took a course that was dedicated to "sources". From this course, I learned different techniques to define a credible source.

As for Wikipedia, I learned that there is a committee that is responsible of the credibility of the information posted website. Still, it is NOT OK. I know, it is checked but : by whom?

My intention is to seek credible information from the internet. Please please and please feel free to comment on my blog, I will appreciate your feedback .

Thank you

Wikipedia on YouTube

Image was downloaded from www.smh.com.au